Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 9:04:48 GMT
So it's a wonder that not everyone uses them for their applications. This is probably also because traditional monolithic architecture is more forgiving of certain design gaps , while perfect design is essential for wellfunctioning microservices. Of course, this also requires higher investments . What other disadvantages stem from a microservices architecture? Microservices require a broader scope of knowledge, narrower specialization and more capacities. For communication between microservices, a remote call mechanism is necessary , which cannot be done without a coarser granularity API.
The coarser granularity of the API complicates the eventual redistribution USA Phone Number List of process responsibilities between microservices. High network dependency can be problematic in real life and cause the application to crash. The architecture needs to be well designed so that the user experience of the application is not affected during multiple calls. A microservices architecture requires regular automated testing of real traffic, focusing on bulk calls that could affect the stability of the application. Advanced monitoring is essential to alert you to problems with network latency or throughput in real time.
The sharing of libraries and databases between microservices tends to be problematic if they are too closely connected to each other and thus disrupt their independence . Errors can also appear elsewhere than where they actually arise. Microservices require a comprehensive approach to log collection and application tracing . Who will appreciate a microservicesbased application architecture? Like any solution, pros and cons. So it is clear that they are not suitable for everyone. In companies with smaller teams of developers, the complexity of the architecture would be too much of a burden and would rather slow down the deployment of new versions.
The coarser granularity of the API complicates the eventual redistribution USA Phone Number List of process responsibilities between microservices. High network dependency can be problematic in real life and cause the application to crash. The architecture needs to be well designed so that the user experience of the application is not affected during multiple calls. A microservices architecture requires regular automated testing of real traffic, focusing on bulk calls that could affect the stability of the application. Advanced monitoring is essential to alert you to problems with network latency or throughput in real time.
The sharing of libraries and databases between microservices tends to be problematic if they are too closely connected to each other and thus disrupt their independence . Errors can also appear elsewhere than where they actually arise. Microservices require a comprehensive approach to log collection and application tracing . Who will appreciate a microservicesbased application architecture? Like any solution, pros and cons. So it is clear that they are not suitable for everyone. In companies with smaller teams of developers, the complexity of the architecture would be too much of a burden and would rather slow down the deployment of new versions.